Hey everyone, I’m back to discuss another topic about which drone to buy…
Quick background: I recently got the neo with the rcn3 controller, extra batteries, goggles n3, and motion controller around two months ago.
I’ve really enjoyed flying the drone. My favorite way to use it is with the fpv setup, goggles, and motion controller. It feels so natural to fly like this, though I often skip taking photos or videos.
But to be honest, I find myself using the rcn3 controller a lot more. It just doesn’t seem practical or safe to fly with goggles alone in many places.
Now, I’m considering upgrading to a better drone since I’m currently in China, where the prices for drones are much lower than back home.
If I could find a NEO with better wind resistance and longer battery life, plus support for both fpv and rcn3 flights, that would be ideal for me. The wind resistance and battery life on my neo tend to frustrate me.
I’m looking at either the avata 2, which seems like an enhanced version of the neo for fpv use, or the mini 4 pro, which appears to offer great battery life and durability while being flexible.
What do you think I should do with this information?
P.S. My English isn’t that great since it’s not my first language, so I hope you can be patient with me.
What are the regulations for drones in your home country?
Avata 2 seems like a solid choice if you still want to fly fpv and use acro mode. But the mini series is also reliable as a good drone, though it can’t fly in acro mode and may be a bit less durable compared to the avata. They might work with goggles, but it’s possible you’ll have to buy different goggles and remotes for different models you want to use.
@Griff
I’m not too familiar with the drone regulations back in Brazil, but I’ll try to check them out. My concern with the avata is that, although I enjoy flying fpv, I often find it safer to fly without goggles since I fly alone and need to stay aware of my surroundings. If only the avata could work with rcn3 or rc2 as well, I think it would be perfect for me. Also, I heard the battery life on the avata isn’t that great.
@Toby
I recommend checking the rules when you get a chance.
On another note, you could connect goggles to a larger screen. I think you can stream to your phone from the goggles or even use a laptop to display what’s going to your goggles.
While I haven’t flown the avata 2 myself, I’ve tried other models quite a lot, and if acro mode is your goal, it seems to be the best all-around dji choice.
As for the mini, I own a mini 2 and it handles windy conditions surprisingly well. Just a heads up, it’s a different experience in terms of flying.
You should definitely consider the mini 4 pro. You would have the option to use either the goggles or the controller, which suits your needs perfectly. Getting the Avata 2 wouldn’t make sense since you wouldn’t be able to use the controller effectively and you prefer it over the fpv setup.
@Jaden
That makes sense, but I have the goggles n3 which don’t work with mini4pro. So, I’d have to spend quite a bit more just to fly fpv. Is the experience of flying mini 4 pro with goggles similar to using the avata 2?
@Toby
I understand your point, but since you typically do most of your flying with a controller, I think that’s your best option. Using the mini 4 pro or the Avata 2 with the goggles gives you the same view in terms of resolution, plus you can control the gimbal in a similar way. The main difference is that the Avata 2 is significantly faster in manual mode, going over 60 mph. The mini 4 pro doesn’t have a manual option, so the closest you get is the sport mode, which flies about half the speed of the Avata 2.
Keep in mind it’s also against the rules to fly fpv alone, at least if you’re in the U.S. It’s a silly rule, isn’t it?
I think we should be allowed to wear goggles when flying at lower altitudes.
Why not check out the Mavic 3 series drones? If you’re open to it, maybe consider the Inspire 2 or 3 as well. I mention this because saving around 50% could be quite a deal.
Anyway, I would recommend looking closely at the Mavic 3.
@FlightFanatic
The Mavic 3 looks like a larger drone and might not be as practical for easy transport. Plus, it seems a bit pricier. But I will take your advice and look into it, thanks!