RC 2 vs RC-N3, which one is better?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the RC 2 controller compared to the RC-N3 paired with a phone?

There’s no difference in range between RC-2 and RC-N3. Both use Occusync 4 technology, and this has been tested by experts.

The RC-N3 paired with a phone may last longer since mobile displays are brighter and less reflective compared to the Android-based system on the RC-2.

If you’re not earning money with your drone yet, the RC-N3 might be the better choice, and you can upgrade later. Mobile phones tend to stay updated longer than the display and chip in the RC-2.

One benefit of the RC-2 is that it has two assignable buttons compared to one on the RC-N3. However, the single button on the RC-N3 can be programmed for single and double clicks, achieving similar functionality.

The RC-2 keeps your phone free for calls or texts while flying. It also means no awkward attachments or worrying about your phone’s battery draining mid-flight, since the RC-2 has its own screen.

Shiloh said:
The RC-2 keeps your phone free for calls or texts while flying. It also means no awkward attachments or worrying about your phone’s battery draining mid-flight, since the RC-2 has its own screen.

The RC-N3 has an option to charge your phone while you’re flying, so battery drain isn’t usually a problem.

@Zachary
True, but charging the phone drains the controller battery faster.

Shiloh said:
@Zachary
True, but charging the phone drains the controller battery faster.

I’ve used the RC-N3 extensively with the phone charging option on, and the battery lasts a long time. Unless you’re flying for hours at a stretch, you shouldn’t have any issues with battery life.

The RC-2 is a nice upgrade if you can afford it. It’s faster to set up, the built-in screen won’t dim or overheat, and it’s much easier to handle calls or texts while flying. While not essential, it’s hard to go back once you’ve used it.

With the RC-N3, you’re reliant on your phone working properly. For example, if your phone’s USB-C port is damaged, you won’t be able to connect it to the controller. This is one advantage of a smart controller like the RC-2—it removes that point of failure.

@Cairo
Make sure to check your cables. Not all USB-C cables support data transfer. I had issues with my DJI FPV until I found the right cable. That said, smart controllers definitely simplify things.

Dana said:
@Cairo
Make sure to check your cables. Not all USB-C cables support data transfer. I had issues with my DJI FPV until I found the right cable. That said, smart controllers definitely simplify things.

In my case, it’s definitely a damaged USB-C port on my phone. I’ll send it in for repair soon.

I use a dedicated cheap Android phone with my RC-N3. It works great, and the phone’s display outperforms the RC-2’s screen in brightness and durability.

Ren said:
I use a dedicated cheap Android phone with my RC-N3. It works great, and the phone’s display outperforms the RC-2’s screen in brightness and durability.

Do phones paired with controllers have latency issues?

@Sage
I use an iPhone 14 Pro Max with my RC-N3 and haven’t noticed any latency. Phones have better screens and chips compared to the RC-2. Some YouTube reviewers exaggerate the benefits of the RC-2 due to paid promotions.

The first time your phone detaches from the controller mid-flight is when you’ll realize how much more reliable a smart controller like the RC-2 can be.

The RC-2 has several advantages:

  1. Separate buttons for recording and photos.
  2. Two dials—one for zoom and one for camera angle.
  3. Two customizable function buttons, compared to one on the RC-N3.
  4. External antennas for better signal adjustment.
  5. Durable gimbals compared to the plastic ones on the RC-N3, which are more prone to breaking.

However, there’s no range advantage for the RC-2. Both controllers use the same Occusync 4 technology.