Why are some transmitters so expensive?

I’m looking into transmitters and see huge price differences. Are expensive ones better in ways that matter for drones? Can they do things that cheaper ones can’t? Does the range depend on the transmitter, or is that more about the receiver? I know some of the differences are in build quality, but I’m not sure what else makes the price go up.

For example, here’s a cheaper option:
https://www.getfpv.com/radios/radio-controllers/radiomaster-radios/radiomaster-pocket-radio-cc2500-elrs-2-4ghz.html

And here’s a more expensive one:
https://www.getfpv.com/radiomaster-tx16s-mkii-max-pro-radio-transmitter-w-ag01-gimbals-lumenier-edition-multi-4-in-1.html

I currently have a Flysky FS-i6X. It has 10 channels, but I don’t know how it compares to these Radiomaster options. I want to do long-range flights, but I’m unsure if Flysky receivers will work with the Speedybee F405 stack I plan to use. Any advice?

The TX16S isn’t really ‘expensive’ compared to alternatives. Look at brands like Jeti or high-end Spektrum transmitters, which can cost over a thousand dollars. If the Pocket meets your needs, go for it. The firmware is the same as the TX16S, so upgrading later won’t feel unfamiliar.

@Justice
True! Many newcomers to drones don’t realize how expensive transmitters used to be before open-source software and affordable hardware became common. A 16-channel transmitter would’ve cost a fortune back then. We’re spoiled now.

@LilyDroneWhisperer
That’s wild to think about.

Merrick said:
@LilyDroneWhisperer
That’s wild to think about.

For context, when I started with RC helicopters, my Futaba 14SG cost $800 and was considered a lower-end model. Now, my Radiomaster TX16S has way more features and only cost me $200. It’s a great time to be in this hobby.

Most radios run the same EdgeTX software, so the differences are in build quality, number of switches, and the protocol they use. ELRS 2.4GHz is the standard now.

The Radiomaster Pocket is highly recommended for those on a budget. If you want better build quality, consider upgrading to AG01 Nano gimbals later.

@Cai
Build quality matters too. Cheaper radios might have switches or gimbals that wear out faster. Gaming controllers, for example, aren’t built to the same standard as RC transmitters.

Neve said:
@Cai
Build quality matters too. Cheaper radios might have switches or gimbals that wear out faster. Gaming controllers, for example, aren’t built to the same standard as RC transmitters.

Gaming controllers feel like toys compared to a good RC transmitter. Over the years, I’ve bought enough cheap gear to learn that you really do get what you pay for. Invest in a solid transmitter, or you’ll likely be upgrading sooner than you think.

@Cai
Thanks for the advice!

@Cai
I’m actually replacing my Taranis radios with Radiomaster Pockets. They just feel better to me.

Zan said:
@Cai
I’m actually replacing my Taranis radios with Radiomaster Pockets. They just feel better to me.

Why do you need so many transmitters though?

Some reasons for the price difference:

  1. More switches for complex setups.
  2. Better screens for telemetry and programming.
  3. Higher-quality gimbals for smoother control.

If you’re doing long-range flights, I’d recommend the TX16S. Even the base model is excellent and doesn’t cost as much as the fully upgraded versions.

@LilyDroneWhisperer
Thank you!

Your expensive example isn’t the best comparison because it’s a special edition with a fancy aluminum faceplate, which drives up the price. A standard TX16S MKII MAX costs less and offers most of the same features.

The range depends on the protocol and the transmitter’s output power. Both the Pocket and the TX16S use ELRS, which is great for long-range flights. The Pocket has a max output of 250mW, but other options, like the Radiomaster Boxer, offer up to 1000mW for even better range.

The main reasons for higher prices:

  • Better parts like gimbals and switches.
  • More features, like touchscreen displays.
  • Higher-quality materials for durability.

The TX16S has more switches and a bigger screen, which is great if you plan to use telemetry or fly more complex models. The Pocket is better for simpler setups.